Provide 10 current articles, no longer than 5 years old. Each citation should have a brief evaluative critique as well. You may want to cite peer-reviewed journals as well as other high-quality e-sites. Your selections are intended to support your personal HIT (Health Information Technology) learning needs. Consider how you can apply this new knowledge to your current practice as an RN and your future practice as an FNP. Some of your articles may come from journals and websites, etc., that are outside of the nursing literature.
The purpose of the brief critique is to inform your peers of the relevance, accuracy, and quality of the sources you cite. Please make your critique/analysis succinct and concise.
To be critical of an article does not mean to criticize in a negative way. Rather, it requires you to question the information and opinions of the information and to present your evaluation or judgment.
State the aim of the article and the main finding(s).
What are the strengths and weaknesses of the article?
Your evaluation/opinion of the article can be a positive or negative evaluation or, as is usually the case, a mixed response.
This раpеr must be between 2 tо 3 pages long (not inсluding the Works Cited page). This paper must be in MLA format.
Be sure to go to chapters 50 and 51 from your course textbook to help you write a paper in MLA format.
The paper must be from one of the topics listed from the list of topics you were given.
The Realist and Naturalist writers place a much greater emphasis on the forces that shape the lives and limit the choices that humans can make. Which two works from this unit show humans as mostly powerless to control their lives and fates? Why? This is an opinion-based question, so your opinion cannot be wrong as long as you follow the guidelines. Another way to imagine this question is this: if you could only assign two readings from this module, and if those two readings needed to get the point across that people don’t have as much control over their lives as they think, then which two works make that point mostly strongly and why?
You might find it helpful to compare readings from this unit to a reading from an earlier unit. You are not required to do that, but you are welcome to bring in earlier works. An “A” answer will discuss at least 2 different Module 3 readings and will quote from 2 distinct assigned readings. Quotations will be introduced and explained,using the Oreo Cookie method as discussed here: Quoting Effectively When Writing about Literature. A full credit answer will be grammatically sound Answers that look like text messages (no capital letters, missing punctuation, etc.) will receive no credit. Answers should be a minimum of 350 words.
For this paper, select a company of your choice (any company), you need to identify, explain, and apply at least five (5) concepts from the course and supplement this information with information from the book (you may choose any concepts from Chapters 1 through 11 either all from the same chapter or a mix of chapters) in addition to using a minimum of five (5) additional outside sources for research.
Wikis, Pedias, and Answer Pages are not resources; citing these as sources will not earn you any credit for the source.
Compare the democracies of The UK and Brazil, I have attached detailed instructions, as well as info on the countries you must use, aside from this you must use at lease 2 scholarly articles, please make sure I have access to these articles. Also please use the horizontal distribution of authority (included in pictures) as part of the comparing criteria.
Link to the document: http://tbf.me/a/ByqxW
Below are the instructions given from instructor. Additional resources will be uploaded to complete the scripted dialogue. Please use the uploaded resource to complete assignment which is the video link, and the history/discharge orders that are required to be used in order to complete a dialogue between the nurse and the patient, Sallie Mae. This dialogue is focused on providing the patient education regarding issues listed in the video link, health history, and discharge orders. Basically what does this patient need to understand in order to optimize her care. The dialogue must reflect careful consideration of her physical, psychological, educational, and spiritual needs. Other resources can be used in order to explain what medications are and how they are to be taken, or to back up any medical information that is not common knowledge. This is NOT a paper defining the information, but a dialogue that teaches the patient. Must be in terms she can understand, on her level of education, and useful to her in her life.
Scripted Dialogue Portion
Utilizing the information learned from the home visit, health histories, and discharge orders, write a scripted dialogue in which you provide Sallie Mae with education that describes her problems and the interventions identified to improve her condition. Consider Sallie Mae’s physiological, psychosocial, educational, and spiritual needs when developing your dialogue.
Your dialogue should resemble a script. The following is an example of a few sentences from a scripted dialogue:
Nurse: “Good morning, Salle Mae, my name is ______ and I will be your nurse today. I understand you are experiencing problems with ________.”
APA format is not required for this part of the assignment, but solid academic writing is expected.
Research on this assignment and write 5 pages based on the question; By Kate Chopin the Awakening. What role does race and class play in this novel? Does Edna have anything in common with the poor black woman who serves her.
Ensure that the assignment is original free from plagiarism and use journals and book as references.
Accounting Gets Radical: The GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) do an unacceptable job of accounting for the principal activities of the Information Age companies. Today, investors are in the dark because the accounting is irrelevant. The basic purpose of accounting is to provide useful information to help investors make rational investment, credit, and similar decisions, but today’s most important assets and activities – intellectual capital and knowledge work – are totally ignored. Professor Robert A. Howell wants to reform the accounting system with the goal of making clear the measurement of how companies produce cash and create value.How would you define the problem in the following case?
Develop a 750 – 1,000 word RFP for an EHR hardware solution that would support the selected solution identified in the EHR Life Cycle Presentation assignment. Take on the vantage point of the informatics director at a facility in need of your solution. Yo
Refer to the following links that explain the RFP process and provide a template that can be modified to suit any situation:
Select one of your suggested solutions you identified in the EHR Life Cycle Presentation assignment.
(Choose from one these)
• Provide the end users access to the hardware within their user – focused training
• Ensure that new updates to hardware
• functionality are clearly communicated
• Set hardware with best practices in mind
Develop a 750 – 1,000 word RFP for an EHR hardware solution that would support the selected solution identified in the EHR Life Cycle Presentation assignment. Take on the vantage point of the informatics director at a facility in need of your solution. Your RFP should include, but not be limited to:
1) A brief cover letter (100-150 words).
2) Summary of company’s background information.
3) Important dates.
4) Contact names/resources for answering questions.
5) Requirements that the hardware supplier is to support.
6) Technical requirements — operating system requirements or network environment/interface needs.
7) Marketing collateral.
8) Any supporting document requirements.
9) The selection process requirements: demonstrations, presentations, testing, install, etc.
The format of this assignment should align with that of a standard RFP.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
Less than Satisfactory
10.0 % Cover Letter The information has minimally been addressed. The information provided is mostly complete and lacks specific information necessary to assist the team in understanding the importance of the proposal. The information provided is appropriate and provides specific information necessary to assist the team in understanding importance of the proposal. The information provided is complete and clear and provides specific information necessary to assist the team in understanding the importance of the proposal. The information provided is comprehensive and provides specific information necessary to assist the team in understanding the importance of the proposal.
25.0 % RFP Includes little knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge is not evident. Analysis of the criteria is not outlined or outlined poorly. No support is evident. Includes little knowledge about the topic with few supporting details and examples. Little subject knowledge is evident. Ignores or superficially evaluates the criteria. Draws unwarranted or fallacious conclusions. Little or no effective support is evident. Includes knowledge about the topic with supporting details and examples. Some subject knowledge is evident. Surface level of evaluation of the content is offered. Some support is evident and relevant. Includes essential knowledge about the topic with supporting details and examples. Subject knowledge appears to be good. Analysis is direct, competent, and appropriate of the criteria. Support is comprehensive and relevant. Covers topic in-depth with extensive details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent. Thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates major points of the criteria. Draws warranted, judicious, non-fallacious conclusions. Significant and best possible support is evident, relevant, and convincing.
25.0 % Research No outside sources were used to support the assignment. Few outside sources were used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent. Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, and/or timeliness. Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive. Addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
10.0 % Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of “primer prose” indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 % Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
5.0 % Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
5.0 % Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
100 % Total Weightage